Hmm. That's kind of slow but not enough to explain the extremely slow startup time.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > (2) Did you try @profile versioninfo() followed by Profile.print()? >> > > The result is very long, but I posted it here: > http://pastebin.com/dBfXmxfy. > > You can try `@time srand("/dev/urandom")` and see how long it takes. >> > > julia> @time srand("/dev/urandom") > elapsed time: 0.278176012 seconds (15944 bytes allocated) > > julia> @time srand("/dev/urandom") > elapsed time: 0.254156666 seconds (664 bytes allocated) > > On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 1:19:03 PM UTC-4, Elliot Saba wrote: >> >> I believe his machine is 64-bit (that's what WORD_SIZE: 64 means in >> versioninfo() above), he merely has 32 cores. :) >> -E >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am probably the wrong person to help with this since I know next to >>> nothing about the internals of Julia, Linux or intel processors... but let >>> me toss out the following remarks: >>> >>> (1) Your earlier messages state that your processors are 32-bit and yet >>> you are running a 64-bit version of Julia. Did you try downloading and >>> testing a 32-bit version of Julia? >>> >>> (2) Did you try @profile versioninfo() followed by Profile.print()? >>> >>> -- Steve Vavasis >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 11:29:53 AM UTC-4, Chris wrote: >>>> >>>> I thought so. Is there a different function in 0.3 that will give the >>>> same kind of information? Any other ideas? >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 8:16:56 PM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 8:15:18 PM UTC-4, Chris wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: RandomDevice not defined >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 6:13:12 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you do @time RandomDevice() and see how long that takes? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> RandomDevice() is only in Julia 0.4. >>>>> >>>> >>
