I'm not sure to be honest. We've never had one badge to aggregate it, I think it'd be too much to cram into a badge. I'm not sure I'll ever test 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 simultaneously. I guess I'll just provide the results, and people can select what they think is relevant to users.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:11 PM, David Anthoff <[email protected]> wrote: > Is the idea that we have a separate badge for every julia version now, > i.e. very soon three? Or is there also one badge that shows the aggregated > information? > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *On Behalf Of *Iain Dunning > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 2, 2015 12:47 AM > *To:* julia-users <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [julia-users] FYI: PackageEvaluator/pkg.julialang.org badge > URL change > > > > Hi all, > > > > In an effort to prepare for a reality where Julia 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5-dev > will all be in the wild simultaneously, I had to change the > PackageEvaluator badge URL scheme. I also took the opportunity to change > the badge design to be more informative about what its showing exactly. > > > > I've fixed about ~100 package READMEs, but there will be many more out > there. > > To fix your README, or to add the badges, simply look up you package on > pkg.julialang.org and click "Get permalink/badge" for the Markdown. Your > badge may still work, depending on when you last updated it, but the link > will almost surely be out-of-date (but won't give a 404). > > > > What is PackageEvaluator, you may ask? See > https://github.com/IainNZ/PackageEvaluator.jl for more info. > > > > Thanks, > Iain > > > > PS: we're not far from 700 registered packages! > -- *Iain Dunning* PhD Candidate <http://orc.scripts.mit.edu/people/student.php?name=idunning> / MIT Operations Research Center <http://web.mit.edu/orc/www/> http://iaindunning.com / http://juliaopt.org
