Yes, but bugs in new features (such as the new documentation system) can (esp. when it is something that replaces older functionality in a different fashion).
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:33:48 PM UTC-4, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > Bugs that aren't regressions shouldn't hold up the release. > > It would be useful to go through the list of issues marked "bug" and mark > those which work fine in 0.3 with the "regression" tag. I've gone through > a couple dozen of the recent bug reports, and so far I haven't found any > clear-cut regressions except #12896. >
