Did anyone ask Forio if they would change the license (as they are obviously not longer interested in the project)?
Uwe Am Montag, 21. September 2015 13:52:57 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker: > > I did consider looking into that but as soon as I saw the license I ran > for my life. Its a similar issue with Julietta. Although what is an issue > to me doesn't have to be an issue to others > > On 2015-09-21 13:48, Steven Sagaert wrote: > > +1 > & to add to Uwe's post: AFAIK JuliaStudio is based on Qt (& QtCreator I > believe). I thought that JuliaStudio was a nice start (also based on > QtCreator). I wish a group would fork it and develop it further in the > direction of RStudio. > > On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, Christof Stocker > wrote: >> >> I would be a huge fan of an RStudio like Julia IDE >> >> On 2015-09-18 10:05, Uwe Fechner wrote: >> >> I like QT a lot. There is more then one open source, QT based IDE out >> there, e.g. QT Creator. >> QT has a GUI builder, that is much better then the GUI builders for GTK >> (in my opinion). >> And you can use the java-script like QML language for building the user >> interface, if you want to. >> >> Tutorial for PyQT: >> https://pythonspot.com/qml-and-pyqt-creating-a-gui-tutorial/ >> >> As soon as the Julia/C++ integration is available by default (hopefully >> in Julia 0.5), QT integration >> should be easy. For those, that want to play with Julia and QT now >> already, have a look at: >> >> https://github.com/jverzani/PySide.jl >> >> (very experimental) >> >> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 08:25:44 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Carrera: >>> >>> There are no Qt bindings for Julia yet. I also don't know what text >>> editing component is provided by Qt or what its features are. I began >>> working with Gtk in part because the Julia Gtk bindings seem to be the most >>> developed. >>> >>> Is there a reason you like Qt besides it being cross-platform? >>> >>> >>> On 17 September 2015 at 23:50, SrAceves <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What about Qt? RStudio is fantastic: Qt based, multi-platoform. >>>> Everything anyone ever wanted of an IDE. >>>> >>>> El martes, 15 de septiembre de 2015, 8:13:04 (UTC-5), Daniel Carrera >>>> escribió: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Last night I started experimenting with Gtk, and started making a >>>>> sketch of what a Julia IDE might look like. In the process I am writing >>>>> down a list of things that are probably needed before a Julia IDE >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> getting a list of things that probably need to exist before a Julia >>>>> IDE can be completed. This is what I have so far: >>>>> 1) A Julia package for the GNOME Docking Library >>>>> >>>>> I think most people expect that an IDE has docking >>>>> >>>>> Despite the name, it does not depend on any GNOME libraries, only Gtk. >>>>> This is what Anjuta and MonoDevelop use to get docking windows. I think >>>>> most people expect to be able to move things around in an IDE. >>>>> >>>>> https://developer.gnome.org/gdl/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 14 September 2015 at 17:10, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gtk, the code isn't published but it's very similar to Julietta: >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/tknopp/Julietta.jl>https://github.com/tknopp/ >>>>>> Julietta.jl >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
