On their homepage they say: "As a desktop replacement for Julia Studio, Forio recommends Juno <http://www.junolab.org>"
Uwe Am Montag, 21. September 2015 18:49:13 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Carrera: > > How do you know they are not interested? > > On 21 September 2015 at 15:05, Uwe Fechner <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Did anyone ask Forio if they would change the license (as they are >> obviously not longer >> interested in the project)? >> >> Uwe >> >> Am Montag, 21. September 2015 13:52:57 UTC+2 schrieb Christof Stocker: >>> >>> I did consider looking into that but as soon as I saw the license I ran >>> for my life. Its a similar issue with Julietta. Although what is an issue >>> to me doesn't have to be an issue to others >>> >>> On 2015-09-21 13:48, Steven Sagaert wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> & to add to Uwe's post: AFAIK JuliaStudio is based on Qt (& QtCreator I >>> believe). I thought that JuliaStudio was a nice start (also based on >>> QtCreator). I wish a group would fork it and develop it further in the >>> direction of RStudio. >>> >>> On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:08:23 AM UTC+2, Christof Stocker >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would be a huge fan of an RStudio like Julia IDE >>>> >>>> On 2015-09-18 10:05, Uwe Fechner wrote: >>>> >>>> I like QT a lot. There is more then one open source, QT based IDE out >>>> there, e.g. QT Creator. >>>> QT has a GUI builder, that is much better then the GUI builders for GTK >>>> (in my opinion). >>>> And you can use the java-script like QML language for building the user >>>> interface, if you want to. >>>> >>>> Tutorial for PyQT: >>>> https://pythonspot.com/qml-and-pyqt-creating-a-gui-tutorial/ >>>> >>>> As soon as the Julia/C++ integration is available by default (hopefully >>>> in Julia 0.5), QT integration >>>> should be easy. For those, that want to play with Julia and QT now >>>> already, have a look at: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/jverzani/PySide.jl >>>> >>>> (very experimental) >>>> >>>> Am Freitag, 18. September 2015 08:25:44 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel Carrera: >>>>> >>>>> There are no Qt bindings for Julia yet. I also don't know what text >>>>> editing component is provided by Qt or what its features are. I began >>>>> working with Gtk in part because the Julia Gtk bindings seem to be the >>>>> most >>>>> developed. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a reason you like Qt besides it being cross-platform? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17 September 2015 at 23:50, SrAceves <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What about Qt? RStudio is fantastic: Qt based, multi-platoform. >>>>>> Everything anyone ever wanted of an IDE. >>>>>> >>>>>> El martes, 15 de septiembre de 2015, 8:13:04 (UTC-5), Daniel Carrera >>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Last night I started experimenting with Gtk, and started making a >>>>>>> sketch of what a Julia IDE might look like. In the process I am writing >>>>>>> down a list of things that are probably needed before a Julia IDE >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> getting a list of things that probably need to exist before a Julia >>>>>>> IDE can be completed. This is what I have so far: >>>>>>> 1) A Julia package for the GNOME Docking Library >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think most people expect that an IDE has docking >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Despite the name, it does not depend on any GNOME libraries, only >>>>>>> Gtk. This is what Anjuta and MonoDevelop use to get docking windows. I >>>>>>> think most people expect to be able to move things around in an IDE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://developer.gnome.org/gdl/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 14 September 2015 at 17:10, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gtk, the code isn't published but it's very similar to Julietta: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/tknopp/Julietta.jl>https://github.com/tknopp/ >>>>>>>> Julietta.jl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
