Thank you, Kristoffer. I have read the manual and your post about not getting carried away by the red == bad assumption <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/julia-users/@code_warntype$20red$20bad/julia-users/g9O9Ik5OAJA/uSGNDyCDEuEJ>. Yet, for a for loop, one would not expect so much output.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Kristoffer Carlsson <[email protected] > wrote: > It can be a bit difficult to read the output from code_warntype. A good > heuristic is to just look at the variables on the top and the final return > type. If these are concrete then you are fine. If not, then you can look at > the messy code in between to find where the instability occurs. > > For your examples, everything is OK.
