>> This is the lowered and typed abstract syntax tree that you're seeing, >> so two steps removed from what you've typed already (and another two >> steps to go to get to machine code). Thus it gets more verbose. I >> guess it would be nice to translate this typed code back to what you >> wrote but with type annotations and display that. But that is not >> possible (yet?). Have you seen this short and sweet JuliaCon >> presentation by Jacob: >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYZkHudRTvI&list=PLP8iPy9hna6Sdx4soiGrSefrmOPdUWixM&index=16 >> > > Yes, you worded better than I could: whether it is possible to get a sort > of breadth first view of the code. From the nice (and too short, thanks for > the link) presentation, it seems that this is not possible. Is there any > hope that the "yet?" will become reality? I understand thought that this > may be a request from somebody unable to read quickly the output of > code_typed.
If I understand correctly, this issue is requesting this feature https://github.com/jakebolewski/JuliaParser.jl/issues/22 . By the sounds of it, it's not going to happen tomorrow but maybe the day after.
