Sadly that wants to make a matrix of two long rows ;) like the hcat(...). 
So needs the transpose as well ... maybe this is the way?
Thanks for opening my eyes to mapreduce though!

On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 09:43:59 UTC-7, Glen O wrote:
>
> One relatively neat way to do this is
>
> mapreduce(exact,hcat,linspace(0,10,100))
>
> On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 02:38:56 UTC+10, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>>
>> Okay sorry tab seems to send ...
>>
>> I am trying my to figure out the Julian way to create a table of values 
>> (matrix) from a function that returns multiple values. As this is really 
>> thinking about the problem as a function that generates the rows of the 
>> table it feels super awkward to do this in Julia currently. For example, 
>> lets say I have a function of the form:
>>
>> function exact(t)
>>     yout = zeros(2)
>>     yout[1] = 3.0*exp(t) - 2.0*exp(t)
>>     yout[2] = exp(t) + 2.0*exp(t)
>>     yout
>> end
>>
>> then what i want is a matrix of these solutions so my first thought is to 
>> do
>>
>> esol = [exact(t) for t in linspace(0, 10, 100)]
>> hcat(esol...)'
>>
>> is this the idiomatic solution?
>>
>> Is there a better way to do this? How do people generally deal with Array 
>> or Arrays. Feels weird to me currently.
>>
>> Gabriel
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 09:31:22 UTC-7, Gabriel Gellner wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying my to figure out the Julian way to create a table of values 
>>> (matrix) from a function that returns multiple values. As this is really 
>>> thinking about the problem as a function that generates the rows of the 
>>> table it feels super awkward to do this in Julia currently. For example, 
>>> lets say I have a function of the form:
>>>
>>> function exact_solution(t)
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to