i am grasping at resolving just how "fungible" a Julia required LISP is ...
could any LISP work (in theory) ... ? what would the optimal LISP be ... ? could the 22k wonder LISP be the optimal LISP ... ? other contemplations appreciated ! On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 7:31:52 AM UTC-7, Jeff Bezanson wrote: > > Looks very cool! Of course I'd be interested in compiling julia's > frontend with something like this. We could badly use the extra speed. > I assume it supports macros, in which case I hope somebody makes a > library to undo the silly identifier renaming (e.g. defn -> define) so > it can run more scheme-like code. >
