Bash script for running julia from whichever directory a binary distribution has been unpacked into (modify directory pathname to match your setup):
julia-cbe1bee3a8/bin/julia --depwarn=no $1 Having saved this as 'j', I can run a jl program like this: j test.jl On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Forrest Curo <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, the problem was that Ubuntu julia was version 4.1, properly > installed, while Debian was 4.0 with directories in nonestandard places. > > Downloading & extracting the 4.1 binary to my home directory, running it > from there as: > julia-cbe1bee3a8/bin/julia newbox.jl > works fine. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Forrest Curo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Following an example on another site, I see that staying with the REPL >> and typing: >> include("newbox.jl") >> >> would work (aside from needing to change a package name or two -- and >> possibly finding some way to put in '--depwarnings=no' -- I can't be sure >> whether that's still needed(?)) >> >> What's gone wrong with simply running a script from the command line? >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Forrest Curo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have the latest julia version installed on ubuntu and debian >>> partitions on my hard drive. >>> >>> On the ubuntu, I can type [for example]: >>> julia --depwarning=no newbox.jl >>> >>> and that file loads, runs, exits. >>> >>> On the debian, julia comes up in REPL mode and my file seems >>> unrecognized. (Likewise if I stay in the REPL & try >>> run(`newbox.jl') >>> >>> Something wrong with my path on the debian? I'm just bewildered! >>> >> >> >
