I work on Lora (from master which hasn't been pushed to METADATA), running 
lines 1-34 in test/BasicMCJob.jl, which works works fine in Julia 0.4.2. 
However, 0.5 throws the following:

*ERROR: MethodError: `data` has no method matching data(::Function)*

* in ##run_basicmcjob#8537 at 
/Users/theodore/.julia/v0.5/Lora/src/jobs/BasicMCJob.jl:329*

* in run at /Users/theodore/.julia/v0.5/Lora/src/jobs/BasicMCJob.jl:402*

* in eval at 
/Applications/Julia-0.5.0-dev-b77587362d.app/Contents/Resources/julia/lib/julia/sys.dylib*


I checked my own code, the breakage occurs at some point where I generate 
code (a function) and then evaluate it to actually get a function. I 
grep-ed for "data(" both in my package (which I know by heart and can tell 
the function names on top of my head after so much work on Lora..). and in 
julia. In the latter case, julia's code base has many occurrences of 
"...data(...", not sure where to start from.


Thanks for asking and for trying to help.

On Saturday, 2 January 2016 22:51:06 UTC, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>
> Le samedi 02 janvier 2016 à 14:30 -0800, Theodore Papamarkou a écrit :
>
> I receive an error in Julia 0.5, which does not happen in 0.4.2. Due to 
> the complexity of the underlying code it is hard to isolate the problem, 
> and even more intriguingly, the error message I receive comes out of the 
> blue complaining about a method error for a "data" function, which I 
> haven't defined anyhow anywhere in my code. I know that due to the little 
> amount of information I provide, it will be hard to receive any help, but I 
> thought it would be worth posting the error below, just in case anyone else 
> has ever seen it in Julia 0.5:
>
> *ERROR: MethodError: `data` has no method matching data(::Function)*
>
> * ...*
>
> * in eval at 
> /Applications/Julia-0.5.0-dev-b77587362d.app/Contents/Resources/julia/lib/julia/sys.dylib*
>
> Is there anything interesting in the ... part? What packages are you 
> using? I would grep for "data(" in the source of all of them.
>
>
> Regards
>

Reply via email to