I can confirm that I do not see the seg fault issue in 0.5 (the latest master), but I am getting fundamentally different results when using the @sync @parallel construction. In essence, @sync @parallel is causing arrays of different values (compared to using a non-parallelized construction) to be built, which is causing an issue further along in my program. It is also much slower, so I am wondering if I my syntax is incorrect.
Any input would be appreciated. You can see what is supposed to be generated by loading this script (https://github.com/pazzo83/QuantJulia.jl/blob/master/swaption_test_code.jl) and calling main(). Thanks! On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 4:48:51 AM UTC-5, Lutfullah Tomak wrote: > > There is this issue on on github > https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/14764 . I am no expert about > parallel computing but may be related. > > Regards >
