Is this something that would really only be solved by proper multi-threading?
On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 12:49:50 PM UTC-5, Christopher Alexander wrote: > > I can confirm that I do not see the seg fault issue in 0.5 (the latest > master), but I am getting fundamentally different results when using the > @sync @parallel construction. In essence, @sync @parallel is causing > arrays of different values (compared to using a non-parallelized > construction) to be built, which is causing an issue further along in my > program. It is also much slower, so I am wondering if I my syntax is > incorrect. > > Any input would be appreciated. You can see what is supposed to be > generated by loading this script ( > https://github.com/pazzo83/QuantJulia.jl/blob/master/swaption_test_code.jl) > and calling main(). > > Thanks! > > On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 4:48:51 AM UTC-5, Lutfullah Tomak wrote: >> >> There is this issue on on github >> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/14764 . I am no expert about >> parallel computing but may be related. >> >> Regards >> >
