I just updated Jude so you can configure your Julia path. Good to know we can eventually get autocomplete in the console for autocomplete+.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Mike Innes <[email protected]> wrote: > This is very cool! RE the path, perhaps it could make sense for Jude to > check for the `julia-client.juliaPath` before defaulting to `julia`? I'm > also hoping that julia-client can expose some kind of API eventually so > that people can build whatever custom interactions they want. > > Autocomplete in the console is definitely an issue, but there's actually a > set of PRs to Atom and autocomplete-plus that will help us fix this. In > future, there's no reason not to expect both julia-client and Jude > autocompletions to be available there. > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 at 05:17 James Dang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Evan, no, the console is controlled by Juno (or "julia-client" in >> Atom), and Jude can't hook into that. Besides, Jude is complementary and >> distinct from what Juno provides. Jude does auto-complete within scopes, so >> you can get autocomplete in the middle of a function body you are editing, >> which might be nested deep in a module which is imported into your main >> script. Juno does auto-complete just on your main script, ie at global >> scope, just like a Julia REPL. It's probably possible for Juno to >> eventually hook its own auto-completes into the console. It's just not as >> easy because then it can't use Atom's Autocomplete+ package. >> >> Instead, you could type your code directly into your source file, >> leveraging Jude's autocomplete there. Then once you're done typing the >> line, you could type Ctrl-Enter to execute it via Juno. When I use Juno, I >> rarely have to type directly into the console. I usually just edit a script >> file and run the lines individually. >> >> >>
