Kevin: computers that program themselves is a concept which is much closer to reality than most would believe, but julia-users isn't really the best place for this speculation. If you're actually interested in writing code, I'm happy to discuss in OnlineAI.jl. I was thinking about how we might tackle code generation using a neural framework I'm working on.
On Friday, June 3, 2016, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > If Andrew Ng who cited Gates, and Gates who cited Domingos (who did not > lecture at Google with a TensorFlow question in the end), were unsuccessful > penny traders, Julia was a language for web design, and the tribes in the > video didn't actually solve problems, perhaps this would be a wildly > off-topic, speculative discussion. But these statements couldn't be farther > from the truth. In fact, if I had known about this video some months ago I > would've understood better on how to solve a problem I was working on. > > For the founders of Julia: I understand your tribe is mainly CS. This > master algorithm, as you are aware, would require collaboration with other > tribes. Just citing the obvious. > > On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 10:21:25 AM UTC-3, Kevin Liu wrote: >> >> There could be parts missing as Domingos mentions, but induction, >> backpropagation, genetic programming, probabilistic inference, and SVMs >> working together-- what's speculative about the improved versions of these? >> >> Julia was made for AI. Isn't it time for a consolidated view on how to >> reach it? >> >> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:20:35 PM UTC-3, Isaiah wrote: >>> >>> This is not a forum for wildly off-topic, speculative discussion. >>> >>> Take this to Reddit, Hacker News, etc. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I am wondering how Julia fits in with the unified tribes >>>> >>>> mashable.com/2016/06/01/bill-gates-ai-code-conference/#8VmBFjIiYOqJ >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8J4uefCQMc >>>> >>> >>>
