https://github.com/tbreloff/OnlineAI.jl/issues/5
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-3, Kevin Liu wrote: > > I plan to write Julia for the rest of me life... given it remains > suitable. I am still reading all of Colah's material on nets. I ran > Mocha.jl a couple weeks ago and was very happy to see it work. Thanks for > jumping in and telling me about OnlineAI.jl, I will look into it once I am > ready. From a quick look, perhaps I could help and learn by building a very > clear documentation of it. Would really like to see Julia a leap ahead of > other languages, and plan to contribute heavily to it, but at the moment am > still getting introduced to CS, programming, and nets at the basic level. > > On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 10:48:15 AM UTC-3, Tom Breloff wrote: >> >> Kevin: computers that program themselves is a concept which is much >> closer to reality than most would believe, but julia-users isn't really the >> best place for this speculation. If you're actually interested in writing >> code, I'm happy to discuss in OnlineAI.jl. I was thinking about how we >> might tackle code generation using a neural framework I'm working on. >> >> On Friday, June 3, 2016, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If Andrew Ng who cited Gates, and Gates who cited Domingos (who did not >>> lecture at Google with a TensorFlow question in the end), were unsuccessful >>> penny traders, Julia was a language for web design, and the tribes in the >>> video didn't actually solve problems, perhaps this would be a wildly >>> off-topic, speculative discussion. But these statements couldn't be farther >>> from the truth. In fact, if I had known about this video some months ago I >>> would've understood better on how to solve a problem I was working on. >>> >>> For the founders of Julia: I understand your tribe is mainly CS. This >>> master algorithm, as you are aware, would require collaboration with other >>> tribes. Just citing the obvious. >>> >>> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 10:21:25 AM UTC-3, Kevin Liu wrote: >>>> >>>> There could be parts missing as Domingos mentions, but induction, >>>> backpropagation, genetic programming, probabilistic inference, and SVMs >>>> working together-- what's speculative about the improved versions of >>>> these? >>>> >>>> Julia was made for AI. Isn't it time for a consolidated view on how to >>>> reach it? >>>> >>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 11:20:35 PM UTC-3, Isaiah wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is not a forum for wildly off-topic, speculative discussion. >>>>> >>>>> Take this to Reddit, Hacker News, etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am wondering how Julia fits in with the unified tribes >>>>>> >>>>>> mashable.com/2016/06/01/bill-gates-ai-code-conference/#8VmBFjIiYOqJ >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8J4uefCQMc >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
