In fact no I did just try it. Anyway thank to all of you :)
On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 1:11:49 AM UTC+2, baillot maxime wrote: > > @Tim Holy : Thank you for the web page. I didn't know it. Now I understand > a lot of thing :) > > @Kristoffer and Patrick: I just read about that in the link that Tim gave > me. I did change the code and the time just past from 0.348052 seconds to > 0.037768 seconds. > > Thanks to you all. Now I understand a lot of things and why it was slower > than matlab. > > So now I understand why a lot of people was speaking about Devectorizing > matrix calculus. But I think it's sad, because if I want to do this I will > use C or C++ . Not a matrixial language like Julia or Matlab. > > Anyway! So if I'm not mistaking... It's better for me to create a "mul()" > function than use the ".*" ? >
