Indeed, the behavior of deepcopy with respect to arrays of user defined 
types is surprising.

If you define 

Base.deepcopy_internal(x::MyType, ::ObjectIdDict) = MyType(deepcopy(x.a))

then deepcopy(MyType_Vec[[1, 3, 1]]) gives a new object with "independent" 
elements. See 
also http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/stdlib/base/#Base.deepcopy


On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 8:56:32 PM UTC+2, Josh Langsfeld wrote:
>
> For your second question, I would have expected just doing 
> deepcopy(MyType_Vec[[1,3,1]]) would have created a new array with a new 
> object allocated for each element. Instead, it puts the same object (which 
> is a copy) in the first and third positions and you get the same behavior. 
> Maybe this is not the intended behavior of deepcopy?
>
> You can easily get around though this by explicitly calling deepcopy on 
> each element directly: MyType_Vec = map(deepcopy, MyType_Vec[[1,3,1]]). A 
> similar alternative with an array comprehension would be: MyType_Vec = 
> [deepcopy(MyType_Vec[i]) for i in [1,3,1]].
>
> (an array comprehension also answers your first question: MyType_Vec = 
> [MyType([0.0]) for i=1:3])
>
> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 11:47:39 AM UTC-4, Jan wrote:
>
> I have a beginner question for which I cannot find the answer after quite 
>> some searching. 
>>
>>
>> type MyType
>>   a::Array{Float64,1}
>> end
>>
>> # Fill an array with "independent" instances of MyType. (By the way, is 
>> there a shorter way to do this?)
>>
>> MyType_Vec = Array(MyType, 3);
>>
>> for i in eachindex(MyType_Vec)
>>
>>   MyType_Vec[i] = MyType([0.0]);
>>  
>> end
>>
>> MyType_Vec
>>
>> # Change the value of MyType_Vec[1].a[1] to 2.
>>
>> MyType_Vec[1].a[1] = 2;
>>
>> MyType_Vec
>>
>> # Shuffle the vector but with repeated elements
>>
>> MyType_Vec = MyType_Vec[[1,3,1]];
>>
>> # Change the value of MyType_Vec[1].a[1] to 4.
>>
>> MyType_Vec[1].a[1] = 4;
>>
>> MyType_Vec
>>
>> # The value of MyType_Vec[3].a[1] also changed to 4.
>>
>>
>> How can I avoid this reference behaviour? I want that, after the 
>> shuffling step, the 3 elements of MyType_Vec should be "independent" so 
>> that if I change MyType_Vec[1].a[1] nothing else is affected. I have 
>> tried copy and deepcopy without success.
>>
>> I would be very happy if someone could help me out. I'm stuck...
>>
>> Many thanks in advance.
>>
> ​
>

Reply via email to