If anyone knows how to fix ConjugatePriors, I'm all ears. I have a PR to update the dependencies but I quickly realized that getting it to work requires more than bumping versions, and I haven't been able to pinpoint exactly what needs to change.
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:44:51 PM UTC-7, Kris De Meyer wrote: > > I noticed that in Distributions from 0.9 onward the Normal and MvNormal > distributions were parameterised on Real (similar to what I did for > PDMats). That work should have made my test fix in that pull request > obsolote. In other words, if ConjugatePriors was/is updated to work with > Distributions > v0.9, then the 2 line change I did in > https://github.com/JuliaStats/ConjugatePriors.jl/pull/10 > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJuliaStats%2FConjugatePriors.jl%2Fpull%2F10&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHvy-KS6qzhulRVnrYb39VJQXbe0A> > shouldn't > even be there anymore. This would require more of a change to > ConjugatePriors than simply that test fix though. Has this been looked at? > > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 4:46:04 AM UTC+1, Tony Kelman wrote: >> >> FengYang is right. Remove ConjugatePriors. That package needs a new tag >> that's compatible with the latest versions of its dependencies, otherwise >> having it installed is going to cause issues like this. >> >> I'm not sure what's needed beyond >> https://github.com/JuliaStats/ConjugatePriors.jl/pull/10 >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJuliaStats%2FConjugatePriors.jl%2Fpull%2F10&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHvy-KS6qzhulRVnrYb39VJQXbe0A> >> >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:41:38 PM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: >>> >>> Did you post your full Pkg.status() yet? Is something keeping you stuck >>> on StatsFuns 0.2.x? The only new upper bound I see in the METADATA versions >>> is from https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl/pull/5613 >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:09:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, here is the same thing but from my METADATA. >>>> >>>> Code: >>>> >>>> metadata_dir = "/home/tim/.julia/v0.4/METADATA" >>>> for (pkg, version) in Pkg.installed() >>>> >>>> reqfile = joinpath(metadata_dir, pkg, "versions", string(version), >>>> "requires") >>>> >>>> if isfile(reqfile) >>>> lines = open(readlines, reqfile) >>>> println("#"^20) >>>> println(pkg) >>>> for line in lines >>>> print(line) >>>> end >>>> println("") >>>> end >>>> end >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see >>>>> http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals. >>>>> >>>>> The trailing dash means including prereleases of the given version. >>>>> (Considering how unintuitive this is we should probably transition to >>>>> something clearer when we redesign Pkg.) The first number given is an >>>>> inclusive lower bound, and if a second number is given then it's an >>>>> exclusive upper bound. >>>>> >>>>> I see a few packages applying upper bounds to ForwardDiff, and a few >>>>> to MathProgBase and ReverseDiffSparse. I may have missed something (were >>>>> these taken from METADATA or the package directory? It should be the >>>>> former, sorry if I didn't say as much - METADATA can be changed >>>>> after-the-fact but tagged package content can't) but those don't look >>>>> like >>>>> they would conflict. >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I wrote the script and put the output in the attached file. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume that the '-' at the end of a dep is an upperbound? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:35:46 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok, will do! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it >>>>>>>> points at the wrong package. If we can come up with a reproducible >>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>> case here it'll help for fixing the bug and making that message more >>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's almost certainly not Compat (I don't think anyone has ever >>>>>>>> added an upper bound to a Compat dependency). Perhaps loop over >>>>>>>> Pkg.installed() and display the contents of the REQUIRE file for the >>>>>>>> specific tags you have currently installed, see who is upper-bounding >>>>>>>> each >>>>>>>> other? We do need better tools for debugging this kind of thing to >>>>>>>> make it >>>>>>>> easier to figure out what the dependency resolver is doing, which >>>>>>>> bound >>>>>>>> constraints are active etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:25:53 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Okay - I removed GaussianMixtures and now it is complaining about >>>>>>>>> Compat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ERROR: unsatisfiable package requirements detected: no feasible >>>>>>>>> version could be found for package: Compat >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wrote a script to run through all package REQUIRE files and >>>>>>>>> print out the Compat line, if any. None of these found anything >>>>>>>>> specifying >>>>>>>>> an upper-bound. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would like to find the offending packages. Is there a good way >>>>>>>>> to go about doing this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ArgParse: Compat 0.7.3 >>>>>>>>> ArrayViews: Compat >>>>>>>>> AutomotiveDrivingModels: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> AxisAlgorithms: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> BayesNets: Compat >>>>>>>>> BinDeps: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> Blink: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>>>>>> Blosc: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> BufferedStreams: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> Cairo: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Calculus: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>>>>>> Codecs: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>>>>>> Colors: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Compose: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Conda: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> ConjugatePriors: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>>>>>> Contour: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> DataArrays: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>>>>>> DataFrames: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> Debug: Compat >>>>>>>>> Discretizers: Compat >>>>>>>>> Distances: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> Distributions: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>>>>>> Docile: Compat 0.7.1 >>>>>>>>> FastAnonymous: Compat >>>>>>>>> FileIO: Compat 0.7.19 >>>>>>>>> FixedPointNumbers: Compat 0.7.14 >>>>>>>>> FixedSizeArrays: Compat 0.8.7 >>>>>>>>> Formatting: Compat >>>>>>>>> ForwardDiff: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>>>>>> Gadfly: Compat 0.8.5 >>>>>>>>> Glob: Compat >>>>>>>>> Graphs: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>>>>>> Gtk: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> GtkUtilities: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>>>>>> GZip: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> HDF5: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Hexagons: Compat >>>>>>>>> Hiccup: Compat 0.8.2 >>>>>>>>> HttpCommon: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>>>>>> HttpParser: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>>>>>> HttpServer: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>>>>>> IJulia: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>>>>>> ImageMagick: Compat 0.7.7 >>>>>>>>> Images: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> ImageView: Compat 0.4.6 >>>>>>>>> IniFile: Compat 0.7.4 >>>>>>>>> Interact: Compat 0.7 >>>>>>>>> Interpolations: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Ipopt: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Iterators: Compat >>>>>>>>> JLD: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> JSON: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> JuMP: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>>>>>> KernelDensity: Compat >>>>>>>>> LaTeXStrings: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Lazy: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> LegacyStrings: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> Libz: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> LightXML: Compat 0.8.3 >>>>>>>>> Lint: Compat 0.8.2 >>>>>>>>> Loess: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> MacroTools: Compat >>>>>>>>> MathProgBase: Compat 0.7.13 >>>>>>>>> MbedTLS: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> MLBase: Compat >>>>>>>>> MultivariateStats: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> Mustache: Compat 0.7.18 >>>>>>>>> NBInclude: Compat 0.7.9 >>>>>>>>> Nettle: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> NLopt: Compat 0.8 >>>>>>>>> Optim: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> ParserCombinator: Compat 0.7.12 >>>>>>>>> PDMats: Compat >>>>>>>>> PGFPlots: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> PlotlyJS: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>>>>>> Plots: Compat >>>>>>>>> PositiveFactorizations: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> ProfileView: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> PyCall: Compat 0.7.1 >>>>>>>>> PyPlot: Compat 0.4 >>>>>>>>> Ratios: Compat >>>>>>>>> RDatasets: Compat >>>>>>>>> Reactive: Compat >>>>>>>>> Reel: Compat >>>>>>>>> Requests: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> ReverseDiffSparse: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>>>>>> SHA: Compat 0.7.9 >>>>>>>>> Showoff: Compat >>>>>>>>> SIUnits: Compat >>>>>>>>> SortingAlgorithms: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> StatsBase: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>>>>>> StatsFuns: Compat 0.7.18 >>>>>>>>> Sundials: Compat >>>>>>>>> SymPy: Compat 0.4 >>>>>>>>> TexExtensions: Compat >>>>>>>>> TextWrap: Compat 0.7.15 >>>>>>>>> TikzGraphs: Compat >>>>>>>>> TikzPictures: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> Tk: Compat 0.4.6 >>>>>>>>> URIParser: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> VideoIO: Compat 0.8.7 >>>>>>>>> WebSockets: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>>>>>> Winston: Compat 0.4.4 >>>>>>>>> WoodburyMatrices: Compat >>>>>>>>> Zlib: Compat >>>>>>>>> ZMQ: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:40:37 AM UTC-7, Chris >>>>>>>>> Rackauckas wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe one of its dependencies has a maximum version requirement? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:38:01 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Okay, this is a little weird. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I run the following it looks like the culprit is a dirty >>>>>>>>>>> package: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> julia> Pkg.checkout("Distributions") >>>>>>>>>>> INFO: Checking out Distributions master... >>>>>>>>>>> INFO: Pulling Distributions latest master... >>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: Distributions is fixed at 0.10.1+ conflicting with >>>>>>>>>>> requirement for GaussianMixtures: [0.0.0,0.10.0) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The weird thing is that the REQUIRE file for GaussianMixtures >>>>>>>>>>> does not mention the 0.10.1+ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> julia 0.3 >>>>>>>>>>> Clustering >>>>>>>>>>> Distributions >>>>>>>>>>> PDMats >>>>>>>>>>> Compat >>>>>>>>>>> JLD >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Where does that come from? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:31:44 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Julia Users, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed something a little weird. I am using >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributions.jl (great package btw) in Julia 0.4.6 on Ubuntu, and >>>>>>>>>>>> it is >>>>>>>>>>>> listed in Pkg.status() as a required package: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Distributions 0.8.9 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I checked on METADATA and on the Distributions.jl github - >>>>>>>>>>>> there is a more recent version. In fact, there are several more >>>>>>>>>>>> recent >>>>>>>>>>>> versions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I ran Pkg.update(), which updated some things but did not >>>>>>>>>>>> change Distributions.jl. Am I missing something? Is there some >>>>>>>>>>>> package that >>>>>>>>>>>> requires Distributions be less-than-current? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
