Thank you. I should have RTFM. The file is not from METADATA. I can check that.
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:28 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: > > I hate to have to say "RTFM" about this so often, but see > http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/strings/#version-number-literals. > > The trailing dash means including prereleases of the given version. > (Considering how unintuitive this is we should probably transition to > something clearer when we redesign Pkg.) The first number given is an > inclusive lower bound, and if a second number is given then it's an > exclusive upper bound. > > I see a few packages applying upper bounds to ForwardDiff, and a few to > MathProgBase and ReverseDiffSparse. I may have missed something (were these > taken from METADATA or the package directory? It should be the former, > sorry if I didn't say as much - METADATA can be changed after-the-fact but > tagged package content can't) but those don't look like they would conflict. > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >> >> I wrote the script and put the output in the attached file. >> >> I assume that the '-' at the end of a dep is an upperbound? >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:35:46 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>> >>> Ok, will do! >>> >>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:31:25 AM UTC-7, Tony Kelman wrote: >>>> >>>> There's a bug somewhere with that error message, I've seen it points at >>>> the wrong package. If we can come up with a reproducible test case here >>>> it'll help for fixing the bug and making that message more useful. >>>> >>>> It's almost certainly not Compat (I don't think anyone has ever added >>>> an upper bound to a Compat dependency). Perhaps loop over Pkg.installed() >>>> and display the contents of the REQUIRE file for the specific tags you >>>> have >>>> currently installed, see who is upper-bounding each other? We do need >>>> better tools for debugging this kind of thing to make it easier to figure >>>> out what the dependency resolver is doing, which bound constraints are >>>> active etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:25:53 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Okay - I removed GaussianMixtures and now it is complaining about >>>>> Compat. >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: unsatisfiable package requirements detected: no feasible >>>>> version could be found for package: Compat >>>>> >>>>> I wrote a script to run through all package REQUIRE files and print >>>>> out the Compat line, if any. None of these found anything specifying an >>>>> upper-bound. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to find the offending packages. Is there a good way to go >>>>> about doing this? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> ArgParse: Compat 0.7.3 >>>>> ArrayViews: Compat >>>>> AutomotiveDrivingModels: Compat 0.8 >>>>> AxisAlgorithms: Compat 0.8 >>>>> BayesNets: Compat >>>>> BinDeps: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> Blink: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>> Blosc: Compat 0.8 >>>>> BufferedStreams: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> Cairo: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Calculus: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>> Codecs: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>> Colors: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Compose: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Conda: Compat 0.8 >>>>> ConjugatePriors: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>> Contour: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> DataArrays: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>> DataFrames: Compat 0.8 >>>>> Debug: Compat >>>>> Discretizers: Compat >>>>> Distances: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> Distributions: Compat 0.4.0 >>>>> Docile: Compat 0.7.1 >>>>> FastAnonymous: Compat >>>>> FileIO: Compat 0.7.19 >>>>> FixedPointNumbers: Compat 0.7.14 >>>>> FixedSizeArrays: Compat 0.8.7 >>>>> Formatting: Compat >>>>> ForwardDiff: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>> Gadfly: Compat 0.8.5 >>>>> Glob: Compat >>>>> Graphs: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>> Gtk: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> GtkUtilities: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>> GZip: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> HDF5: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Hexagons: Compat >>>>> Hiccup: Compat 0.8.2 >>>>> HttpCommon: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>> HttpParser: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>> HttpServer: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>> IJulia: Compat 0.7.20 >>>>> ImageMagick: Compat 0.7.7 >>>>> Images: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> ImageView: Compat 0.4.6 >>>>> IniFile: Compat 0.7.4 >>>>> Interact: Compat 0.7 >>>>> Interpolations: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Ipopt: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Iterators: Compat >>>>> JLD: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> JSON: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> JuMP: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>> KernelDensity: Compat >>>>> LaTeXStrings: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Lazy: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> LegacyStrings: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> Libz: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> LightXML: Compat 0.8.3 >>>>> Lint: Compat 0.8.2 >>>>> Loess: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> MacroTools: Compat >>>>> MathProgBase: Compat 0.7.13 >>>>> MbedTLS: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> MLBase: Compat >>>>> MultivariateStats: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> Mustache: Compat 0.7.18 >>>>> NBInclude: Compat 0.7.9 >>>>> Nettle: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> NLopt: Compat 0.8 >>>>> Optim: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> ParserCombinator: Compat 0.7.12 >>>>> PDMats: Compat >>>>> PGFPlots: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> PlotlyJS: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>> Plots: Compat >>>>> PositiveFactorizations: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> ProfileView: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> PyCall: Compat 0.7.1 >>>>> PyPlot: Compat 0.4 >>>>> Ratios: Compat >>>>> RDatasets: Compat >>>>> Reactive: Compat >>>>> Reel: Compat >>>>> Requests: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> ReverseDiffSparse: Compat 0.8.6 >>>>> SHA: Compat 0.7.9 >>>>> Showoff: Compat >>>>> SIUnits: Compat >>>>> SortingAlgorithms: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> StatsBase: Compat 0.8.4 >>>>> StatsFuns: Compat 0.7.18 >>>>> Sundials: Compat >>>>> SymPy: Compat 0.4 >>>>> TexExtensions: Compat >>>>> TextWrap: Compat 0.7.15 >>>>> TikzGraphs: Compat >>>>> TikzPictures: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> Tk: Compat 0.4.6 >>>>> URIParser: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> VideoIO: Compat 0.8.7 >>>>> WebSockets: Compat 0.7.16 >>>>> Winston: Compat 0.4.4 >>>>> WoodburyMatrices: Compat >>>>> Zlib: Compat >>>>> ZMQ: Compat 0.8.0 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:40:37 AM UTC-7, Chris Rackauckas >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe one of its dependencies has a maximum version requirement? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:38:01 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Okay, this is a little weird. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I run the following it looks like the culprit is a dirty package: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> julia> Pkg.checkout("Distributions") >>>>>>> INFO: Checking out Distributions master... >>>>>>> INFO: Pulling Distributions latest master... >>>>>>> WARNING: Distributions is fixed at 0.10.1+ conflicting with >>>>>>> requirement for GaussianMixtures: [0.0.0,0.10.0) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The weird thing is that the REQUIRE file for GaussianMixtures does >>>>>>> not mention the 0.10.1+ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> julia 0.3 >>>>>>> Clustering >>>>>>> Distributions >>>>>>> PDMats >>>>>>> Compat >>>>>>> JLD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where does that come from? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:31:44 AM UTC-7, Tim Wheeler wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Julia Users, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just noticed something a little weird. I am using >>>>>>>> Distributions.jl (great package btw) in Julia 0.4.6 on Ubuntu, and it >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> listed in Pkg.status() as a required package: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Distributions 0.8.9 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I checked on METADATA and on the Distributions.jl github - there is >>>>>>>> a more recent version. In fact, there are several more recent versions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I ran Pkg.update(), which updated some things but did not change >>>>>>>> Distributions.jl. Am I missing something? Is there some package that >>>>>>>> requires Distributions be less-than-current? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>> -Tim >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
