"An hour", pfhh, I only wish I was that efficient. I really like it, also looking very much forward to reading the comments people will make on this.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Tom Breloff <t...@breloff.com> wrote: > I stole an hour this morning and implemented this: https://github.com/ > tbreloff/ConcreteAbstractions.jl > > It's pretty faithful to my earlier description, except that the macros > names are `@base` and `@extend`. Comments/criticisms welcome! > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Michael Krabbe Borregaard < > mkborrega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> First, apologies, I didn't mean that you wanted to 'subvert' ( >> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subvert) julia. As a >> non-native speaker the finer nuances of English sometimes slip. The word I >> was looking for was perhaps 'sidestep'. >> Also I see your point that as long as the Abstract type cannot be >> instantiated, the problem with putting supertypes in an array should not be >> relevant. So perhaps this is actually a nice general solution to the issue. >> > >
