Tom, the coarseness encountered when trying splatfields with type parameters: is it endemic and likely to persist or does this grow better in v0.6+?
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 11:20:35 PM UTC-4, Tom Breloff wrote: > > I like splatfields but I think it's hard to make work with type parameters > (which is normally a deal breaker for me) > > On Thursday, September 15, 2016, 'Greg Plowman' via julia-users < > julia...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Another variation on Chris's @commonfields and Tom's @base & @extend: >> >> This is somewhere between example 2 and 3, >> Avoids copy and paste of example 2 >> Avoids delegating to Foo of example 3 >> >> abstract AbstractFoo >> >> type Foo <: AbstractFoo >> bar >> baz >> end >> >> type Foobar <: AbstractFoo >> @splatfields Foo >> barbaz >> bazbaz >> end >> >> Also allows for "multiple" composition/inheritance. >> >> >> >
