Wou, that s some hi skill coding. It takes my a while(don't understand) to
understand it. I got the basics,but I still have couple of questions:
1. what is fn? There is function proc = fn(sock). What it doses with that
2. senddata function should have s1conn = connect(port) or ?
3. Why there is while loop in senddata?
I will try it out today and let you know if it works for me. But for now it
look good and beautiful ^^
One main problem is how to shut down the server, if there is no break or
close command? If I try to stop Julia in Atom, the console says Julia has
stom, but atom is sitll running the program. Only option is close Atom and
restart it. Any good solutions for this?
keskiviikko 14. syyskuuta 2016 13.30.05 UTC+3 Tanmay K. Mohapatra kirjoitti:
> I did not find any slowness when I ran the code.
> My environment:
> Julia Version 0.4.6
> Commit 2e358ce (2016-06-19 17:16 UTC)
> Platform Info:
> System: Linux (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz
> WORD_SIZE: 64
> BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)
> LAPACK: libopenblas64_
> LIBM: libopenlibm
> LLVM: libLLVM-3.3
> The only thing I observed when I send messages rapidly is the buildup of
> TCP sockets (in closewait, timewait states).
> I'm not sure if that could be causing the slowness you observed.
> That is usually addressed by tuning system parameters, primarily
> net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range, net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout (ref.
> http://www.linux-admins.net/2010/09/linux-tcp-tuning.html for more
> I reorganized the code somewhat (here:
> https://gist.github.com/tanmaykm/c2ab61a52cc5afa0e54fe61905a48ef1) to
> make it easier to understand/reuse.
> With this it seems possible to merge server1 and server2 into one server
> and not have an additional hop between the two.
> You may need them separate though, if you have many server1 and server2
> Hope this helps.
> - Tanmay
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 6:20:55 PM UTC+5:30, Karli Kund wrote:
>> I posted question in stackoverflow with no answers:
>> Maybe from here.