Yes, I think the general plan of the DataFrames maintainers is to largely rely on packages like Query and StructuredQueries for data manipulation.
There is another benefit of having this kind of query infrastructure in its own package: all the query operations that I showed that use Query also work against any other data source, i.e. you can use those with arrays, dictionaries, directly with a CSV source (and everything will be streamed, no allocations of intermediates!), TypedTables, IndexedTables and many more. Cheers, David From: karbar...@gmail.com [mailto:karbar...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jacob Quinn Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 11:14 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [julia-users] Filtering DataFrame with a function I think the Julia ecosystem is evolving tremendously in this respect. I think originally, there were a lot of these "mammoth" packages that tried to provide everything and the kitchen sink. Unfortunately, this has led to package bloat, package inefficiencies in terms of load times and installation, and unmaintainability. DataFrames and Gadfly are great examples. The trend more recently has been a rededication to small, modular packages that interopt nicely with others. This means moving things **out** of packages that aren't totally essential: or in the case of DataFrames, that can include things like IO (CSV.jl), data manipulation (Query.jl and StructuredQuery.jl), and others. Ultimately, with the help of core languages features like (https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/15705), I think we'll continue to see packages slim down. This, of course, opens up more possibilities in the future for so-called "meta" packages that could bundle several packages together. These "meta" packages are then essentially tasked with tracking versions, dependencies, and so forth while individual packages can focus on simple, solid code. -Jacob On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Júlio Hoffimann <julio.hoffim...@gmail.com <mailto:julio.hoffim...@gmail.com> > wrote: Thank you very Much David, these queries you showed are really nice. I meant that ideally I wouldn't need to install another package for a simple filter operation on the rows. -Júlio 2016-10-12 22:14 GMT-07:00 <anth...@berkeley.edu <mailto:anth...@berkeley.edu> >: Were you worried about Query being not lightweight enough in terms of overhead, or in terms of syntax? I just added a more lightweight syntax for this scenario to Query. You can now do the following two things: q = @where(df, i->i.price > 30.) that will return a filtered iterator. You can materialize that into a DataFrame with collect(q, DataFrame). I also added a counting option. Turns out that is actually a LINQ query operator, and the goal is to implement all of those in Query. The syntax is simple: @count(df, i->i.price > 30.) returns the number of rows for which the filter condition is true. Under the hood both of these new syntax options use the normal Query machinery, this just provides a simpler syntax relative to the more elaborate things I've posted earlier. In terms of LINQ, this corresponds to the method invocation API that LINQ has. I'm still figuring out how to surface something like @count in the query expression syntax, but for now one can use it via this macro. All of this is on master right now, so you would have to do Pkg.checkout("Query") to get these macros. Best, David On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 6:47:15 PM UTC-7, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: Hi David, Thank you for your elaborated answer and for writing a package for general queries, that is great! I will keep the package in mind if I need something more complex. I am currently looking for a lightweight solution within DataFrames, filtering is a very common operation. Right now, I am considering converting the DataFrame to an array and looping over the rows. I wonder if there is a syntactic sugar for this loop. -Júlio 2016-10-12 17:48 GMT-07:00 David Anthoff < <mailto:ant...@berkeley.edu> ant...@berkeley.edu>: Hi Julio, you can use the Query package for the first part. To filter a DataFrame using some arbitrary julia expression, use something like this: using DataFrames, Query, NamedTuples q = @from i in df begin @where <filter expression> @select i end You can use any julia code in <filter expression>. Say your DataFrame has a column called price, then you could filter like this: @where i.price > 30. The i will be a NamedTuple type, so you can access the columns either by their name, or also by their index, e.g. @where i > 30. if you want to filter by the first column. You can also just call some function that you have defined somewhere else: @where foo(i) As long as the <julia expression> returns a Bool, you should be good. If you run a query like this, q will be a standard julia iterator. Right now you can’t just say length(q), although that is something I should probably enable at some point (I’m also looking into the VB LINQ syntax that supports things like counting in the query expression itself). But you could materialize the query as an array and then look at the length of that: q = @from i in df begin @where <filter expression> @select i @collect end count = length(q) The @collect statement means that the query will return an array of a NamedTuple type (you can also materialize it into a whole bunch of other data structures, take a look at the documentation). Let me know if this works, or if you have any other feedback on Query.jl, I’m much in need of some user feedback for the package at this point. Best way for that is to open issues here https://github.com/davidanthoff/Query.jl. Best, David From: julia...@googlegroups.com <mailto:julia...@googlegroups.com> [mailto:julia...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Júlio Hoffimann Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:20 PM To: julia-users <julia...@googlegroups.com <mailto:julia...@googlegroups.com> > Subject: [julia-users] Filtering DataFrame with a function Hi, I have a DataFrame for which I want to filter rows that match a given criteria. I don't have the number of columns beforehand, so I cannot explicitly list the criteria with the :symbol syntax or write down a fixed number of indices. Is there any way to filter with a lambda expression? Or even better, is there any efficient way to count the number of occurrences of a specific row of observations? -Júlio