You are right.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Steven G. Johnson <stevenj....@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:34:38 PM UTC-4, Michele Zaffalon wrote:
>>
>> quadgk(t -> cis(gamma(t)), 0, 1)
>>
>
> No, this is wrong because you forgot the Jacobian factor.
>

Reply via email to