You are right. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Steven G. Johnson <stevenj....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:34:38 PM UTC-4, Michele Zaffalon wrote: >> >> quadgk(t -> cis(gamma(t)), 0, 1) >> > > No, this is wrong because you forgot the Jacobian factor. >