Awesome. Thanks!
On Monday, 31 October 2016, Spencer Russell <s...@media.mit.edu> wrote: > I generally have pretty granular `@testset`s, which can have messages > attached that are printed on failure. That way I still get a description of > what failed. > > I think the lack of indentation for nested testsets is a regression that > hit 0.5 (BaseTestNext on 0.4 indents nested testsets), and there’s > currently an issue filed: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/18611 > > so they should get re-prettified soon enough. > > -s > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Florian Oswald wrote: > > I know there are many testing packages out there. I have been using > FactCheck, but have seen it's been relegated to the JuliaArchive. I take > that as a sign it's a good moment to use something else. > > There is 1 thing I sorely miss from Base.Test coming from FactCheck, and > that is the ability to say > > @fact false --> true "your test failed: false is not true" > > i.e. i can print a custom error message to be shown upon failure only. > > I also think the display of test results (indentation of lower level > "contexts" (@testsets in Base.Test)) is nicer in FactCheck, but that's not > that important. > > Thanks for any advice. > > > >
