Hi Stefan, > > Putting all together it's quite tempting to say: "...why don't we simply > > adopt the Core from Kosmo as the OJ Core altogether...?!?". > > > What is your oppinon on that? Pro's & Con's? > (this goes especially to Larry, SIGLE/Erwan, Ugo, Michael and the Pirol
When you check out Kosmo rc1, I think you'll find that it has made many changes to the basic JUMP interface. Some are understandable, but others seem to be just gratuitous. From the SkyJUMP perspective, (small maps, easy to use, many CAD-like editing tools) there doesn't seem to be much to take away. Others will no doubt be excited by the heavy weight data sources, and removal of memory bound restrictions. I'm still going through it, but it looks to still be a work in progress compared to OJ. I would recommend putting off any decision until there is a mature version of Kosmo. regards, Larry Becker ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
