The display of vertises on themed layers works for me.  Point colour theming
works too.  Transparency turns out to be implemented on a per layer basis.

I did verify the polygon layer without attribute vertex bug.

Larry

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Larry Becker <becker.la...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Jukka,
>
>   As usual you make excellent suggestions. See my comments below.
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was thinking that now when Matthias and Larry have been working with
>> selection styles it might be good to collect a list about things in
>> OpenJUMP styling which do not work or work in somehow irritating way.
>>
>> I can start with couple of issues:
>>
>> - Colour theming option creates all the new classes with the default
>> styles. Each theme will then have both the fill and line rendering
>> selected, colours are synchronised, and line width is 1. However, I
>> would rather see the classifier to take the defaults from the Rendering
>> tab so I could set for example the line width somehow bigger for all the
>> classes. Usually it would mean less manual fine tunign this way.
>>
>
> This seem reasonable to me.  I have wished for the same thing.
>
>
>> - It seems to be impossible to show vertises on classified layers. There
>> is no user interface for that in the "Colour Theming-Custom" and
>> defaults are not taken from the main Rendering tab.
>>
>
> This and the previous request can probably be done by updating the UI
> dialog.
>
>
>> - The above issue, I think, makes it impossible to use colour theme on
>> point layers. Or it is possible, OpenJUMP is doing the classification,
>> but all the points are still rendered with the same colour.
>>
>
> I need to look into this one.
>
>
>> - "Custom" dialogue for a classified layer shows also Transparency
>> slider. However, it is affecting all the classes and not only the
>> selected one. It might be better to remove the slider from the "Custom"
>> dialogue.  There is another slider on the main Colour Theming tab and
>> also the transparency slider on the main Rendering tab can be used.
>>
>
> Actually the use of both could be possible if the one that affects all is
> proportional as in Layer properties.
>
>
>> - There is a little issue with the polygon styling. If I create a new
>> layer with OpenJUMP and draw a polygon, and next select to show vertices
>> option from the Rendering tab, as a result ONLY the vertices are shown
>> but the outline and fill disapper. It took me a long time to discover
>> that this happens only if a layer does not have any attribute fields in
>> its schema. It is enought to insert one attribute field into the schema
>> to correct the rendering. Attribute field can be empty for all the
>> features, it does not matter.
>>
>
> Sounds like a bug.
>
>
>>
>> To start a wishlist for the future, QGis "New symbology" option gives a
>> possibity to build easily multi-layer or multi-stroke symbols. Something
>> like that would by nice to have in OpenJUMP also. For example a road
>> with red fill, black borders and black dottet centre line could be
>> constructed by piling up a wide black line, a narrover red line and a
>> most narror black dottet line on top. For point layers even such a
>> simple style than big coloured circle and a small insert with another
>> colour can make the map much more easier to read.
>>
>
> It is possible to augment the existing style with another tab that would
> allow an additional overlay.
>
>
>>
>> GGis User manual
>> http://download.osgeo.org/qgis/doc/manual/qgis-1.4.0_user_guide_en.pdfha
>> s something about New Symbology option in chapter
>> 5.4.3. Working with the New Generation Symbology
>> On manual page 54, Figure 16, (a) Line composed from three simple lines
>> may give an idea about multi-layer symbols.
>>
>> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>
>> Make an app they can't live without
>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to