Today I made a quick test on OJ 3004 comparing it to ver 3272 (before
Ede's modification). They both show the same behavior
a)
I started digitalizing a linestring
than click again to other tools without finalizing the 1st geometry OR
click to a zoom tool
- The 1st phantom disappears
b)
Start to diraw a linestring than click again to linestring tool
- the phantom doesn't disappears and user can go on drawing the original
linestring
In OJ 3004 is also possible (test B) to use Pan/Zoom shortcuts. In some
cases there it is possible to see a ghost line (a sequence of red points)
using Pan shortcuts that disappears after few seconds.
Anyhow 3004 seems as stable (no ghost, the same behavior) as 3272
It would be interesting to have an option as described by Michael (start
digitizing than click on a zoom tool, pan than finishing the geometry) but
I think that we can consider this as a further development (after OJ 1.6).
Peppe
2013/3/7 Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>
> Hi,
>
> Almost. I seems that selecting the same tool again does not do cancel and
> by doing that it is still possible to make ghost lines and also to make
> othet shortcuts (pan, zoom) to behave in an odd way. If you can also make
> re-selecting the same digitizing tool to cancel drawing then I would
> suggest to freeze this situation till 1.6 release.
>
> I have not tested thoroughly all the very nice new shortcuts.
>
> -Jukka-
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [edgar.sol...@web.de]
> Lähetetty: 8. maaliskuuta 2013 0:37
> Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] "ghost shapes" be gone WAS: About user interface for
> digitizing
>
> Jukka,
>
> could you comment on the below? especially on the status quo. is switching
> tools via mouse behaving as it used to be?
>
> ..ede
>
>
> On 07.03.2013 23:25, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> > Hi,
> >>> should be fixed in 3304.. please check. ede
> >>> Ghost disappeared, but unfortunately, we need them when changing the
> >>> cursor to zoom tool or pan tool (may be also select, info...)
> >> whqt do i miss? did we ever have what you describe above?
> > Maybe not :-[ (must I say that I do not edit so much ?)
> >
> > But I think it is an important feature to be able to zoom/pan
> > during editing.
> > I know it is possible with shortcuts, but maybe not as easy
> > to find (as said before by Jukka).
> > My feeling is that it maybe better to keep the (ghost) shape
> > in all cases than to loose it when using a non-editing cursor
> > tool.
> > Just an opinion. Jukka and Peppe have a better experience
> > about what is user-friendly or not with these tools and you
> > know better than I do how to keep this part of the code
> > consistent.
> >>
> >>> Ideally, cancelling a shape editing sequence should be authorized by
> >>> cursors allowed to edit shapes, not others.
> >>> At least I think so.
> >> how do you mean? can you give an example?
> > Yes.
> > If you start a linestring, I think that
> > - cliking the linestring cursor tool again or any other editing tool
> > (tools of the editing toolbox minus select tools) should cancel the
> > shape.
> > - clicking select or any non editing tool (zoom, pan, measure) should
> keep
> > the ghost and make it possible to finish it after yo have moved or check
> > some attributes...
> >>
> >>> Should we create an interface for that ?
> >> not until i know what you mean ;)
> > Of course, hope I made it more clear.
> >> afaik i restored the behaviour as it was before the shortcuts, didn't i?
> > Probably. Sorry for the confusion. So many propositions have
> > been discussed that I gave my opinion without knowing exactly
> > how it was and what has changed.
> >
> > Michaël
> >
> >>
> >> ...ede
> >>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
