On 18.10.2016 14:56, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Hi, > > > > I agree that it is logically good that non-visible layer is not editable > because I can’t imagine a real world use case where it would be better to > create features without seeing the other features of the layer. However, > sometimes it is useful to switch the layer off and have a look under the > existing lines and polygons which are covering the background. Now turning > layer non-visible turns it also into non-editable and user must re-activate > the edit mode. I am not sure if this automatic switch to non-editable is an > improvement or not. With the current default “only one editable layer at a > time” the risk to digitize features into a non-visible layer by accident is > not so big because of the radio button behavior. If user starts to edit some > other layer the non-visible layer turns into non-editable anyway. >
i'd say this is unintuitive and turning the layer back "on" should restore the previous editable state. we do something comparable when switching a category's visibility on/off already. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
