hey Peppe, looks like those changes are not in *osgeo* OJ 1.16 as well, so no stopper for OJ2 as such.
surely they should be ported to OJ2 in the future, maybe start an issue on github, just to make sure? ..ede On 19.05.2022 10:08, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
Hi Ede, There are still some enhancement/bugs that I did on OpenJUMP 1.16 in december: https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/core/trunk/ChangeLog <https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/core/trunk/ChangeLog> In detail, points 6677 and 6678 are the bugs Thank you Peppe Il giorno lun 16 mag 2022 alle ore 18:43 <edgar.sol...@web.de <mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> ha scritto: hey All, are we satisfied with revamped OJ 2.0 stability and should include it in the upcoming OSGeoLive release? Or do we need to do a quick maintenance release beforehand? Or should we stick with previous stable OJ 1.16 for the time being? .. sunny regards, ede _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel> _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
