On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:15:26AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:44:42AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > If only we ever get "disable" and "enable" for BGP neighbors... sigh... > > > > Yeah, but deactivate, activate, and passive can usually suffice. > > I don't see deactivated peers in "show bgp summary", nor in SNMP etc... > bad. > > Obviously "noone" (with enough revenue prospect/forecast) seems to do > active BGP SNMP monitoring, ... > > It also confuses peers... "peer unconfigured" (deactivate) vs. "admin > shutdown" (disable)... different BGP NOTIFICATION cease subcodes.
Everyone remember to submit your feature ideas to: http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Feature_Requests So that the weaker minded people with the bigger wallets will have something to ask for. True disable for bgp is of course request #2. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
