> > I have a hard time believing the MX isn't crippled in some way, > > because it seems to me that if it weren't, it would stand to > > cannibalize the M Series market.
Not really. It's Ethernet only, and no service PICs or anything like that (so if you need RE-based sampled Netflow you're okay, but you can't do the sampling rates that an M/T could with a suitable PIC. Also, the 10Gig ports *will* handle WAN PHY (this is even documented). > > Is the MX as good as it's cracked up to be? Is the only reason > > Juniper isn't worried about cannibalization due to the fact that the > > MX is Ethernet only where the M is mixed media? > > > it also has ome expensive cards when you want L3 features, like way more > expensive than an M series router. Not really. The cards are dense, but the price per port is quite good if you need the density. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
