On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:02:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I have a hard time believing the MX isn't crippled in some way, > > > because it seems to me that if it weren't, it would stand to > > > cannibalize the M Series market. > > Not really. It's Ethernet only, and no service PICs or anything like > that (so if you need RE-based sampled Netflow you're okay, but you > can't do the sampling rates that an M/T could with a suitable PIC. > Also, the 10Gig ports *will* handle WAN PHY (this is even documented).
Yes, excellent WAN PHY support, feels just like you've got a SONET interface with complete and detailed alarms. One thing I forgot to mention, the only feature that should be there but isn't is RE-based RPM support. Everything else is fully implemented as of current code, including GRES, ISSU (well it works as well as on an M-series at any rate), OAM, etc. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
