Hello Rubens, I have used Cisco 7600, XR 12410 and Juniper 9.x TE. Works fine. Remember that what Cisco call fast reroute is not the same Juniper calls fastreroute.
Good Luck, Alaerte > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. IOS JUNOS MPLS-TE interoperability (Rubens Kuhl Jr.) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 21:40:40 -0300 > From: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] IOS JUNOS MPLS-TE interoperability > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hi, > > Does anyone has experience with MPLS-TE interoperability between IOS > (specifically ME6500, but it's probably like any other 12.2SX IOS) and > JUNOS (recent/stable/good-for-service-providers version) ? > > I was wondering about 2 cenarios in particular: > 1) JUNOS as head-end or tail-end, but not middle-point > 2) JUNOS as head-end, tail-end and middel-point > > All routers would be in the same OSPF area 0, within the same AS #; TE > is done by explicit naming of both primary, secondary paths, and a > dynamic backup path. AUTOBW is desired. On IOS, traffic is injected on > the tunnel using static route to the loopback address; OSPF contains > only link states and loopbacks, directly-connected, customer static > routes or customer dynamic routes are propagated via IBGP. > > > Tks, > Rubens > > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
