I've found better vendor interop using l2circuit, as someone else on the list mentioned, and have had them working between JNPR, Foundry, Cisco, and even lower-end MRV switches. I find the configuration of L2circuits simpler in JUNOS as well. However, if better traffic eng is what you need, the comments made by others in this thread are very pertinent as well.
If you're talking multipoint and using VPLS, BGP-signalled VPLS is nice in JUNOS because of the autodiscovery, whereas LDP-signalled VPLS requires that you visit every PE that a given VPLS customer touches if you add 1 more site on a new PE (although vendors like Foundry are adding some kind of autodiscovery to account for this I think...perhaps Juniper will too). Also, likely better vendor interop here too, with LDP-signalled. My $0.02 David 2009/1/8 Andrew Jimmy <[email protected]>: > What are the major differences between l2cirucit and l2vpn in terms of > Juniper JUNOS. Which is best in replacing Cisco L2TPv3 pseudo-wr. > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
