On Tuesday 13 January 2009 07:23:50 pm Anton Delport wrote: > Hi Mark
Hi Anton. > You should have ICMP tunneling enabled on all P routers. We tried this before and it didn't work; perhaps because we need to do the same on the Cisco P routers (although those are really collapsed P/PE boxes). Is it necessary to have ICMP Message Tunneling on the Juniper-based PE routers as well (we tried that too, but it didn't help)? > 9.3R2.8 is affected by PR/396280. Ah, so it is related :-). > As the PR mentions, you > need 2 conditions to be true to be affected by this PR. > (a) per-packet load balancing > (b) multiple equal-cost paths on the egress interfaces. > > Are these true in your scenario? Yes, these conditions are true. Appreciate your feedback, Anton. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
