Hi, These seems to be a common issue here with SFPs working in one rel and suddenly not in the next rel. This really sucks quite a lot, why is this happening?
Rather than ask if there is a supported SFP for this release/hardware, I'd like to know why SFPs that worked fine suddenly break with a point software upgrade! Any response from Juniper? -- Leigh On 14/02/2009 22:42, "Ruslan A. Magomedov" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I saw the same after upgrading from 9.2R2.15 to 9.3R2.8 and have not > tried later releases yet > > Switch stopped detecting two SFP-SX installed in 4x GE SFP module > I do not know what brand they were > > PIC 1 REV 03A 711-021270 AR0208112594 4x GE SFP > Xcvr 0 NON-SFP XGS00206 UNKNOWN > Xcvr 1 NON-SFP XGS00208 UNKNOWN > Xcvr 2 m> NON-JNPR H22L935 SFP-LX10 > Xcvr 3 r NON-JNPR H22L933 SFP-LX10 > > Best regards, > Ruslan > > Jeff S Wheeler wrote: >>> Is that an official SFP bought from juniper? >>> >>> Perhaps they have decided that any SFP NOT from them will no longer >>> be allowed to work due to it not having a magic number in its >>> memory stored on the SFP. >> That was my concern. I believe I will get a Juniper branded 1000baseT >> SFP and try the 9.4 upgrade again. I was surprised that a Cisco brand >> 10GBASE-LR XFP continued to work while all my generic SFP-Ts failed to >> establish any link. >> >> I had hoped one of the Juniper list readers might comment on this. >> > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
