On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Joseph Soricelli <[email protected]> wrote: > If you want the BGP route to be in the table but not active you will need > that same route in inet.0 from a different protocol with a lower protocol > preference. > > I'm trying to get a better idea of the ultimate goal here. I'm assuming that > you are not in the forwarding path for the routes in question and that the > advertised BGP routes will have traffic flowing across different routers in > the network. If these assumptions are correct (and you know what happens > when you assume!!) then you could add a static route to discard which will > be active in inet.0 and make the bgp routes inactive.
I thought about that too Joe, but I guess that largely depends on the number of routes we are dealing with. Might be a bit unwieldy if he's dealing with a large number of routes... -- Stefan Fouant Windows XP crashed. I am the Blue Screen of Death. No one hears your screams. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
