well Stefan actually my case is little difference , iam taking here about full internet routing table i recieve from BGP peer and i dont want to put these routes into routing table as i use a static default route with differenet next hop to be able to control my upload but at the same time i have some BGP customers who want to send to them the full routing table through BGP so i cant put all these routes to discard as the traffic will be discarded
Best Regards On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Stefan Fouant <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Joseph Soricelli <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you want the BGP route to be in the table but not active you will need >> that same route in inet.0 from a different protocol with a lower protocol >> preference. >> >> I'm trying to get a better idea of the ultimate goal here. I'm assuming that >> you are not in the forwarding path for the routes in question and that the >> advertised BGP routes will have traffic flowing across different routers in >> the network. If these assumptions are correct (and you know what happens >> when you assume!!) then you could add a static route to discard which will >> be active in inet.0 and make the bgp routes inactive. > > I thought about that too Joe, but I guess that largely depends on the > number of routes we are dealing with. Might be a bit unwieldy if he's > dealing with a large number of routes... > > -- > Stefan Fouant > > Windows XP crashed. > I am the Blue Screen of Death. > No one hears your screams. > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
