OSPF works the same in Juniper or Cisco world. But considering 8 routers it wouldn't affect a lot. But do make a topology diagram to just check the links and the cost that might be associated after the change. That would actually be type 10. There would be a small flood of these LSA to even those routers that do not understand this. But is should be okay.
-Hoogen On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Matthew Walster <[email protected]>wrote: > Hey there, > > I'm currently using the default reference-bandwidth for OSPF (presumably > 100M) and would like to change this to 10G to reflect link-capacities more > accurately. > > I have a mix of M7i, MX240 and J6350 at the moment - most of which are > running 9.5, though I believe the J-series routers might be running 8.5. > There are 8 routers in total. > > Is this change "safe" to make on a live system, i.e., will it reset the > OSPF > link-state database, or will it just re-broadcast an LSA as it does in the > Cisco world? > > Additionally, if I was to add OSPF traffic-engineering type 7 LSAs in > preparation for adding MPLS to the network, is that "safe" to change on a > live network? Would it be advisable to change everything at once (with > commit confirmed, of course), or to stagger it over a number of iterations? > > Input appreciated. > > Matthew Walster > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
