2009/9/28 Hoogen <[email protected]> > OSPF works the same in Juniper or Cisco world. But considering 8 routers it > wouldn't affect a lot. But do make a topology diagram to just check the > links and the cost that might be associated after the change. > That would actually be type 10. There would be a small flood of these LSA > to even those routers that do not understand this. But is should be okay. > > -Hoogen >
Thanks - it's an all-Juniper routing scenario. I ask because I tried implementing this last weekend (literally just turning on traffic-engineering and reference-bandwidth 10g) and for 20 minutes I got the same routes to routers (as expected) but there was heavy packet loss to certain destinations. I was just wondering whether there is a step I missed out, if I had to clear OSPF databases etc. What seemed to happen was that during this extended period (minutes, not seconds) the path A-B-C-D wasn't being followed, and the traffic was leaving our network onto a lower local-preference BGP peer on router C. I'll do some further investigation in the lab and work it out. Just wondered if there was something I was missing - setting reference-bandwidth seemed to work fine, it was adding traffic-engineering at the same time that seemed to have played havoc with something. Thanks for the response anyway, Matthew Walster _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
