Hi, Mainly I agree that ScreenOS is more predictable and less buggy than JUNOS Voyager. Although I remember the times of 5.1-5.3 when loads of new features were added and we ran into issues each new release. Specially when ISG had just been released.
But from the features point of view, I really see SRX is at least not worse even though some drawbacks exist like stateful processing for IPv6 or some things we already mentioned. It is well compensated with things ScreenOS has not ever had. In my experience, JUNOS cli itself gives lots of benefits for high-performance environments. Though for ScreenOS people it can be hard to believe this, what they are used to do with a single command now requires five :) I myself have been using all sorts of NetScreen/SSG/ISG since 2003, and think it's one of the best products ever. Specially the old Netscreen line. I even have a 5gt at home :) But unfortunately it is the previous epoch. So I would recommend to buy them only if you really know why you are doing so. Moreover SRX3/5k is quite a different story. ScreenOS products anyway can not compete against them. Sorry, I didn't mean to kindle a holy war :) Just my opinion. Well, maybe not too humble. I have an SSG320, 2x ISG1000s and 4x SRX3400s. > […] > The routing > performance of the SRX, ie, taking a full route table via BGP, is > horrendous. > > Interesting. Did you try to load full BGP into SRX3k? Could you please shere the experience. Any issues or something? -- Regards, Pavel _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
