2010/5/10 Scott T. Cameron <[email protected]> > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Pavel Lunin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Moreover SRX3/5k is quite a different story. ScreenOS products anyway can > > not compete against them. > > > > Are you speaking from experience?
Yeah. All ScreenOS products have CPU-based first packet processing. Same CPU which does control plane. So ISG can only do 23k new sessions per second, NS5k w/MGT3 — 26.5k. At close to 20k new cps those boxes can not do anything else at all. I deployed an SRX3400 with 3 SPC which did 40k new cps having ~50% SPU load at all SPC. More than real-wrold experience. And only NS5400 can do 2M simultaneous sessions, when SRX3400 w/3SPC can do 2.25M (it is real, I saw it myself). SRX5k can do up to 10M. And for sure, NetScreen performance/price ratio is by far much higher. -- Regards, Pavel _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
