There should be a loopback with a valid ipv4/ipv6 address. This address is used as unnumbered source for _any_ created pppoe subinterface.
Kimd regards, Hendrik Am 02.11.2010 um 18:52 schrieb Tom Teeuwen <[email protected]>: > Hello Hendrik, > > Thnx, it works !! > > The local-interface loopback, the IP-adres.. .does it matters ? > > Kind regards, > Tom > > > > ________________________________________ > Van: [email protected] > [[email protected]] namens Hendrik Kahmann > [[email protected]] > Verzonden: dinsdag 2 november 2010 8:07 > Aan: Diogo Montagner; [email protected] > Onderwerp: Re: [j-nsp] ERX310 PPPoE and multiple Virtual-routers > > Hello, > > as far as i know, this might be your solution: > > aaa domain-map "ABC" > router-name "ABC" > local-interface loopback 101 > ipv6-router-name default > strip-domain enable > ! > aaa domain-map "DEF" > router-name "DEF" > local-interface loopback 102 > ipv6-router-name default > strip-domain enable > ! > profile pppoe-defaults > ip mtu 1492 > ip sa-validate > ip tcp adjust-mss 1400 > ppp authentication pap > ! > interface gigabitEthernet 1/0.10 > vlan id 10 > pppoe > pppoe auto-configure > pppoe remote-circuit-id > pppoe profile any pppoe-defaults > ! > interface gigabitEthernet 1/0.20 > vlan id 20 > pppoe > pppoe auto-configure > pppoe remote-circuit-id > pppoe profile any pppoe-defaults > ! > > Users would be j...@abc or j...@def > > > Kind regards, > > Hendrik > > > Am 02.11.2010 05:23, schrieb Diogo Montagner: >> AFAIK, you need different subinterfaces for each virtual-router. >> >> Eg.: >> >> Vlan 10 - VR ABC >> Vlan 20 - VR DEF >> ... >> >> Rgs >> >> On 11/2/10, Tom Teeuwen<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm configuring an ERX310 for PPPoE termination. >>> >>> From the all DSLAM's we get about 190 tagged VLAN's. >>> >>> So for every VLAN i need to create a subinterface. >>> >>> >>> >>> Now we want to create multiple virtual-routers for customers who want to get >>> an VPN. >>> >>> In the basic setup without VR's(only the default) i have a profile bounded >>> to an subinterface. >>> >>> The profile config: >>> >>> profile Test >>> ip unnumbered gigabitEthernet 1/1.102 >>> ppp authentication virtual-router default pap >>> >>> >>> >>> Now I created a VR and a domain-map and mapped a domain to the VR >>> >>> But the PPPoE request is comming from the same subinterface as above >>> specified (where i attached a profile to the subinterface) >>> >>> Problem is that I only can attach one profile to a subinterface. >>> >>> I want the following: >>> >>> - based on a domain attach the PPPoE session to a specific VR >>> >>> - PPPoE request can come from different subinterfaces >>> >>> >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> Customer 1 form subif 1 to VR-A >>> >>> Customer 2 from subif 1 to VR-B >>> >>> Customer 3 from subif 2 to VR-A >>> >>> Customer 4 from subif 2 to VR-B >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Tom >>> _______________________________________________ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> > > > -- > Hendrik Kahmann > B.Sc. Wirtschaftsinformatik > > Planung - Technische Produktentwicklung > Telefon: +49 441 8000 2778 > > mailto:[email protected] > > ___________________________________________ > > EWE TEL GmbH > Cloppenburger Straße 310 > 26133 Oldenburg > > Handelsregister Amtsgericht Oldenburg HRB 3723 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Werner Brinker > Geschäftsführung: Hans-Joachim Iken (Vorsitzender), > Ulf Heggenberger, Dr. Norbert Schulz, Dirk Thole > > Homepage: http://www.ewetel.de > > ___________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
