Hi Guys
thanks i get that. Regards Abhijeet.C ________________________________ From: Mark Tinka <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:24 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QinQ problem On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:29:31 PM [email protected] wrote: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/99661 > > For a *switch* you normally expect VLANs to be "global" > or "chassis wide". For a *router* you normally expect > VLANs to be per-port/per-interface. > > And then there are boxes like Cisco 7600 "routers" :-) > > (Yes, I realize this is a Juniper list.) I guess it's reasonable to discuss them as it's general design principle regardless of vendor. Truth be told, the ES/ES+ line cards on the 7600 (and now 6500) make VLAN ID's locally significant to a port on said line cards (scenarios may vary based on line card generation and number of tags used on sub-interfaces). However, those cards are pricey, and depending on your needs, an ASR9000 or MX240/480/960 may be more ideal. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
