Hi, I suggest some steps below:
- verify the status of the routes in PE4. Are they being received by the BGP neighbor ? Check the protocol NH status. - you need to have an LSP between the PE1 and your RR. Same for PE4 and RR. But I am assuming this is fine because you see the routes being advertised to PE4 from PE2. - on PE4, you need to have a LDP route for PE1. I think this may be your issue and this is why I suggested to check with the ping mpls ldp command. Thanks On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Diogo > > They are not hidden and have already verified the route-target.Its > correctly configured. Any other pointer ? > > Also while using RR do we reallly need the Loopback IP of RR used for > BGP peering to be present in the inet.3 table of PE coz the RR just > reflects the route and does not modifies the NH. All we should need is > the reachability of the remote PE Loopback IP used for BGP Peering to > be in the inet.3 at the Local PE. Is that correct ? > > Thanks much for your help on this issue. > > Regards > Varma > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Diogo Montagner > <[email protected]> wrote: >> You need check the status of the routes in PE4. If they are hidden it >> may be a LDP issue. If there is no hidden route then your problem may >> be wrong route-target selection. >> >> Thanks >> >> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Diogo >>> >>> I have not checked that yet but what I did check was that PE2/RR is >>> advertising the route via BGP to PE4 and PE4 is not accepting it. >>> Right now I do not have access to the setup. >>> >>> Please suggest where can be the issue and what more to check apart >>> from the one you mentioned and I will check and revert in sometime. >>> >>> Regards >>> Varma >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Diogo Montagner >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> What happens if you do a ping mpls ldp from PE4-lo0 to PE1-lo0 ? >>>> >>>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Dear All >>>>> >>>>> I was testing a setup whereby I am using mix of LDP and RSVP in the >>>>> backbone for transporting MPLS VPN Traffic. The setup is something as >>>>> below: >>>>> >>>>> CE1--PE1------PE2/RR-------PE3----PE4------CE2 >>>>> >>>>> Now we have a limitation that we can only run LDP between PE4 and PE3. >>>>> From PE3 to PE2/RR we have RSVP. From PE3 to PE1 we have LDP Tunneling >>>>> over RSVP. >>>>> >>>>> Now the routes of CE1 are not getting installed into the VRF Table on >>>>> PE4. When checked the inet.3 table I do not see the route for PE2/RR >>>>> Loopback but only PE1 and PE3. >>>>> I tried to add a default static into inet.3 or importing the inet.0 >>>>> rib to inet.3 on PE4 but still am not seeing routes. >>>>> >>>>> I think the issue is that the BGP Next Hop is not in inet.3 for >>>>> PE2/RR. How can I achieve to make this setup working apart from >>>>> running LDP Tunneling over RSVP between PE4& PE2/RR or between PE3 & >>>>> PE2/RR. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards >>>>> Vaibhava Varma >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my mobile device >>>> >>>> ./diogo -montagner >>>> JNCIE-M 0x41A >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Vaibhava Varma >>> >> >> -- >> Sent from my mobile device >> >> ./diogo -montagner >> JNCIE-M 0x41A > > > > -- > Regards > Vaibhava Varma > -- Sent from my mobile device ./diogo -montagner JNCIE-M 0x41A _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
