Shouldn't affect it in the classical BGP active./backup sense; only 1 'vrf' is active in a multi-homing BGP setup.
However, since the SRX/J doesn't do that, both will end up being active - You'll need a way to suppress one of them from getting any traffic. Perhaps think about using an EX4200 underneath using an RTG to each SRX at layer 2 to prevent the loop. Should have zero effect on vrrp/layer-3 stuff. - CK. On 23/08/2012, at 7:47 PM, Johan Borch <[email protected]> wrote: > Your'e right of course :) > > My question was more how the VPLS multihoming will affect this setup. > > Regards > Johan > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Chris Kawchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Err VPLS Implies Layer 2 only. > > Where is the VRP runninng in-between? Are you doing "vlan-id" inside the VPLS > instance for normalization, then binding an irb.x into it? I dont think that > works in SRX/J either. (l3 within VPLS). > > - CK. > > On 2012-08-23, at 6:39 PM, Johan Borch wrote: > > > "VPLS multihoming, which allows connecting a CE device to multiple PE > > routers to provide redundant connectivity, is not supported on J Series or > > SRX Series devices" > > > > I'm going to have two SRX's on each site and using vrrp between them, will > > I hit this exception then? > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
