The case with the 4550 in VC is PSN 2013-03-868 Nitzan
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Amos Rosenboim <[email protected]> wrote: > We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile > network core and it is running smoothly so far. > We don't have significant throughput, and we don't run any fancy features. > It's simply serves as L2 port extension for MX routers. > > We have also tried to deploy mixed mode between 4550 and 4200 for an ISP > and had serious issues with arp replies not being forwarded from the 4200to > hosts on the > 4550. > JTAC are working on this and we rolled back to using the switches as > standalone and interconnected the switches using a LAG. > > > Amos > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 1 Mar 2013, at 17:52, "Riccardo S" <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario > with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high > density > (more or less 70) of 10GBs ports. > > Since these architecture should be placed in a > very sensitive position (servers and storage managing online systems of an > important airport), > I'd like to have some "informal" feedbacks if any problems or whatelse > have been experienced by somebody... > > Why chose this design ? only costs... > > Tks > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
