Is there a way to have more details about PSN 2013-03-868 ? Tks
From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:06:07 +0200 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience To: [email protected] CC: [email protected]; [email protected] The case with the 4550 in VC is PSN 2013-03-868 Nitzan On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Amos Rosenboim <[email protected]> wrote: We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile network core and it is running smoothly so far. We don't have significant throughput, and we don't run any fancy features. It's simply serves as L2 port extension for MX routers. We have also tried to deploy mixed mode between 4550 and 4200 for an ISP and had serious issues with arp replies not being forwarded from the 4200 to hosts on the 4550. JTAC are working on this and we rolled back to using the switches as standalone and interconnected the switches using a LAG. Amos Sent from my iPhone On 1 Mar 2013, at 17:52, "Riccardo S" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I'm wondering if anybody have info or experience in a scenario with mixed virtual-chassis (6 equipments between 4500 and 4200) with high density (more or less 70) of 10GBs ports. Since these architecture should be placed in a very sensitive position (servers and storage managing online systems of an important airport), I'd like to have some "informal" feedbacks if any problems or whatelse have been experienced by somebody... Why chose this design ? only costs... Tks _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
